China obstructs Google before Tiananmen date
Hong Kong, China
- In the early hours of June 4, 1989, soldiers from China's People's
Liberation Army (PLA) converged on the few protesters remaining in a
smoke-filled Tiananmen Square. The confrontation with students and
citizens left hundreds or even thousands of people dead, and thousands
more injured.
This week, as the world commemorates the 25-year
anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown, Beijing has been working
ever harder to obscure the digital record of the event.
"We started to notice some problems with Google's
[Internet properties] last week and it soon became clear the
authorities had decided [to] block the sites entirely," said an
anonymous representative of GreatFire.org, a group that charts Internet
censorship in China. By Tuesday morning, the organisation tweeted a
photograph from Google's own transparency report, tacitly confirming
that "All Google services in all countries, encrypted or not, are now
blocked in China".
While censorship in China is not new, the
decision to disrupt access to the Internet giant represents a serious
escalation in the battle to control access to information on the
mainland.
"This is by far the biggest attack on Google that's ever taken place in China," a co-founder of GreatFire.org told The New York Times.
The obstruction, which has impeded access to Google's search function
as well as its images service, Gmail, maps and translation tools, was
followed by reports that the Wall Street Journal's news sites, in both English and Chinese, had also been turned off.
"Google services have been throttled frequently
over the past few years," said Jeremy Goldkorn, the director of Danwei, a
company that tracks China's media and Internet
space. Tensions have grown since Google closed down its mainland China
search engine rather than censoring user searches, as Beijing demanded.
This past March, after revelations of the US National Security Agency's
spying sparked calls for increased privacy and user protections, Google
instituted automatic encryption for all searches, limiting Beijing's
ability to censor specific material.
To block users from accessing information the
government was eager to hide, officials were forced to shut off the flow
entirely, Internet freedom advocates reported.
"Internet users in China have almost come to
expect these sorts of disruptions surrounding the June 4
anniversary," said Jason Ng, a Google policy fellow at the University of
Toronto's Citizen Lab and author of Blocked on Weibo, a book about China's popular Twitter-like service.
Ng remembers similar Internet protocols during the 20th anniversary of
Tiananmen, when users lost access to Twitter, Hotmail and the
self-publishing platform Blogspot. Internet analysts labeled
it "Internet maintenance day".
'Heavily censored'
Last year, Ng published a study investigating
words banned on Sina Weibo, known as China's Twitter. At that time,
flagged phrases included "Tank Man", "Tiananmen incident" and "June 4,"
in addition to allusions to the events, such as "square", "pillar of
shame" and "April 65th" - terms still used to circumvent online censors.
"Over the past few years we've seen a better
understanding by users that the Chinese Internet is heavily censored,"
Goldkorn said. "With the growth of Weibo and the time people spent on
the site, it became clear that certain material was disappearing."
According to a report
published last year by Reuters news agency, 150 censors work for Weibo -
mostly college-aged males - and represent a small fraction of the
untold thousands employed to sift through content in both traditional
and digital media.
"[Chinese President] Xi Jinping, like his
predecessors, is on [a] futile mission to control discussions about
Tiananmen and broader issues," said Sophie Richardson, China director at Human Rights Watch, in a press release last week. The government's search for control led to the arrest of five attendees of a "June 4 Commemoration
seminar", held in a private home, on charges of "creating a public
disturbance". Foreign ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu has officially stated
that "there are no dissidents in China".
Nevertheless, a new generation of Internet users
is developing tactics to push back against the Chinese state, which was
ranked third-to-last in the most recent Freedom on the Net report published by Freedom House, a watchdog group.
GreatFire, the non-profit organisation monitoring
censorship in China, has boasted multiple successes "hacking" through
firewalls on behalf of users. Soon after China's moves against Google
this week, the group created a mirror site, shielded in the cloud
computing infrastructure hosted by Amazon web services. Through a
protected web address, users from mainland China could gain access to
encrypted and untainted Google searches.
"For China to stop our site, they would have to
block access for every user or company that hosts with Amazon," a
GreatFire representative who wished to remain anonymous told Al
Jazeera. "But this would cause severe economic damage, for individual
leaders and their families." Less than two days after erecting the
mirror page, more than 20,000 visitors had used the service, GreatFire
told Al Jazeera.
And GreatFire isn't alone.
Temporary freeze?
GoAgent, a popular anti-censorship tool in China,
uses Google cloud services to ensure that government attempts to block
the system are "technically feasible, but economically disruptive". As
of June 3, however, GoAgent's Google hosting page had been blocked for
users in mainland China.
Whether this week's measures are permanent or temporary remains unclear.
"Based on past history and the potential for
netizen anger, I don't expect the block to last much longer after June
4," said Ng, citing the yearly tensions associated with the Tiananmen
Square anniversary.
What is clear, however, is how little companies like Google can do in response.
"The only arrow in their quiver is that a lot of
Chinese companies use Google's advertising platforms to generate
revenue," said Goldkorn, who also believes the freeze will be temporary
as "so many government officials probably use Gmail".
No comments:
Post a Comment